Mog FYI and Omoggle FYI live face scoring demo

How scoring works

When those cues are scored, each is mapped to a zero-to-ten channel score, then folded with fixed weights into one blend (Z). The headline number is that blend after a framing guard: if you are off-center, moving hard, tiny in frame, or rolled sideways, the read backs off so the comparison does not pretend you were nailed in a fair, neutral pose.

Why these weights mirror mog discourse

Banter is almost always compressed comparison: people gesture at symmetry, jaw, midface, eyes, and “overall harmony” in the same breath as who “wins the frame.” The weights echo that habit—not because internet slang is scientifically true about beauty, but because it marks what spectators already shout about when they mog or get mogged.

Competitive looks spaces love turning judgment into repeatable numbers—streaks, ladders, glow-up arcs—so a verdict can be revisited, rematched, or meme’d. That habit sits underneath mog culture: even when the gossip is subjective, the form is a quick numeric headline people can pass around.

What each slice of Z is emphasizing

• Symmetry (24%) — The largest single share. Split-screen memes, duets, and side-by-side brackets punish obvious lopsidedness first; symmetry tracks who “reads even” on camera.
• Harmony (18%) — A second-pass blend of how jaw width, midface length, cheek spread, eye openness, and eye-to-mouth spacing agree. Culturally, that is the “whole face hangs together” gripe summed as one cue before people declare a mog.
• Jaw (14%) and midface (14%) — Equal mid-tier anchors for two of the most recycled structural talking points in looks threads; neither is allowed to silently steamroll the other.
• Canthal tilt (12%) — Eye-axis signal that still reads at thumbnail distance when people skim comparisons.
• Cheek (10%) and eye shape (8%) — Smaller refiners that nudge “sharpness” reads without overpowering the global balance cues mog threads obsess over.

How harmony stacks before the headline

In mog talk, people pile ratios and vibes until someone lands a summary verdict. Harmony works the same way conceptually: structural cues and spacing get summarized into one intermediate read, and only then does that read feed the top-line blend—small arguments rolling up into the blunt headline people actually quote.

Weight budget for the top-line blend (Z)

Each channel uses a tolerant “good band”: full credit in a normal range, then a smooth falloff toward zero when a cue drifts into cartoon extremes. That keeps mog-style scores from whipsawing on microscopic noise while still rewarding proportions people actually argue about.

What the moving lines represent

Separate traces follow the same story mog threads tell in sequence—this slice, then that slice, then the blunt blend—before a final read that folds in whether the pose was fair. Colored lines are the channels, the dashed line is Z, and the heavy trace is the headline after framing.

Improving the on-camera read

• Framing first: centered, large enough in frame, level head, calm motion, generous margins—otherwise you are not mogging the comparison, you are mogging the webcam.
• Then chase what threads weight highest: symmetry and harmony, with jaw and midface tying for the next tier.